How we rank
BitcoinYield reads the live APY for every asset from every platform we track, so the number you see is the real one. Comparison tables are ranked by yield, adjusted for risk, so the biggest headline number does not automatically win. Search applies your asset, chain and risk limits, then uses the same ranking rule as All offers. An offer’s ranking value does not change when other offers enter or leave the result set. Commissions carry no weight. Here is exactly how the calculation works.
Highest honest yield, first
For each asset we collect every live opportunity across DeFi and CeFi and surface the best current APY, with the full range one click away. We split base yield (organic interest, LP fees, staking rewards) from reward yield (temporary incentive-token emissions) so you can see how durable a rate really is. Flexible lending, fixed-term, staking and CeFi earn products are labeled so you compare like with like, and every APY is the platform’s own live figure, never a cached or estimated number.
Neutrality
- Commissions never change the ranking. Both the comparison tables and the personalized matcher are ordered by live yield and risk alone. Where we earn an affiliate commission, that platform is labeled with a Partner tag, and that label is the only thing it buys: an affiliate platform is never moved up, and a higher or safer yield we do not earn on is never hidden or pushed down. The label is disclosure, not a placement.
- Every APY is a real, live figure. We show the actual current rate from each platform’s own feed and DefiLlama, stamped with when it was fetched, not a cached or estimated number.
- We don’t custody your funds. BitcoinYield is not a platform or an exchange and holds no deposits of its own. We compare everyone else’s live rates, so there is no incentive to steer you to any particular platform.
- The biggest APY is a warning, not a recommendation. The highest headline numbers are usually inflated by temporary token incentives or sit in unaudited, thin pools, so we grade risk from A to D alongside the rate and cap ranking credit when a reported historical mean is available. Missing history limits what the ranking can establish.
How each yield is produced, and how it can break
Two yields at the same rate are not the same bet. The grade below weighs how risky an offer is; this is the shape of that risk. Every offer we track is one of these mechanisms, and each has its own reason a rate can fall or a deposit can be lost.
Supply the asset to an on-chain money market and earn borrower interest. Non-custodial; smart-contract risk.
Deposit a stablecoin in its issuer's savings contract and earn a rate the protocol sets and pays from its own revenue (borrower fees, reserve yield). Withdrawals do not wait on borrowers, but governance can change the rate at any time.
Provide liquidity to a pool and earn fees plus incentives. Impermanent-loss risk on volatile pairs.
Stake a token in a rewards contract to earn another token's emissions. The yield is paid in that reward token, whose price and emission rate can change at any time.
An automated strategy that compounds yield on your behalf. Non-custodial; strategy and contract risk.
Stake and receive a liquid token that accrues staking rewards. Validator and de-peg risk.
Restake staked assets to secure extra services for additional rewards. Added slashing and contract risk.
Lock a fixed yield to maturity. Rate certainty in exchange for a lock-up.
A synthetic-dollar or basis strategy: yield comes from perpetual-funding and staking, not lending. Funding-rate, negative-carry and de-peg risk.
How we grade risk
Beyond the rate, we surface the signals that decide whether a high APY is actually a good deal, never an invented safety score:
- Product type: flexible DeFi lending vs LP and vaults (impermanent-loss exposure) vs staking (lock-up) vs custodial CeFi earn, which is graded on counterparty and custody risk rather than on-chain security.
- Audits and track record: how many security audits a protocol has (a COUNT of audits on record, a coverage proxy, not our judgement of their quality), and any prior exploit, weighted by how recent it was and whether user funds were returned, not a flat ever-or-never.
- TVL and liquidity: how much is actually deposited, and for lending markets how fully utilized they are, because a high APY on a thin pool (or one lent out to the limit) is fragile and hard to exit.
- The dollar behind the rate: for every stablecoin, its own token’s live price and how much of it circulates. We score how far below $1 it trades, and more than 5% below is always grade D. A small dollar cannot earn a top grade from a clean-looking vault alone. A yield-bearing token is checked against the dollar it redeems into, and a dollar we cannot price independently is marked unverified rather than assumed healthy. We also score what backs it: a dollar backed by a trading strategy (synthetic), by loans (credit) or by an algorithm carries that design’s risk wherever it is held, so staked USDe in a fixed-rate Pendle position is graded for Ethena’s basis trade exactly as it is in Ethena’s own vault. The price shows a dollar that has broken; the design shows how it can break.
- Structural category risk: extra weight for structures a pure on-chain read misses, such as bridges, uncollateralized lending, real-world assets and leveraged strategies.
- Yield durability: whether the current APY is stable or spiking above its own 30-day norm on short-lived rewards, shown through the base-versus-reward split.
It is not a judgement call. Each signal below adds a fixed number of risk points, we add them up, and the total sets the grade on fixed cutoffs. Nothing here depends on whether we earn a commission. This is the exact rubric the site runs, published so you can reproduce any grade yourself:
Follow the source of the yield
Lending interest, trading fees, investment income and token incentives have different risks. A payment stablecoin, a yield-bearing token and a tokenized fund are different products. Check the actual instrument, eligibility and withdrawal terms at the linked source. The quoted APY alone cannot establish who owes you money or whether you can withdraw it.
The Treasury-linked yield reference
We take the median of reported APYs for the Treasury-linked assets in our catalog, using the deepest quoted market for each product. A quote must have a valid collection time within the last six hours and must not be marked stale or spiking. At least three distinct products must qualify; otherwise we omit the reference. Credit and crypto-carry products are excluded.
The current reference is about 3.41%, from 9 Treasury-linked products. It updates with the feed and can become unavailable if too few recent quotes remain.
This is a comparison of quoted yields, not the US Treasury bill rate or a risk-free return. Fees, underlying investments, custody, smart contracts, investor eligibility and redemption restrictions vary. A rate above the reference does not measure the extra risk; a rate below it does not prove safety. The SEC explains that tokenized securities differ in structure and holder rights.
Data and freshness
We track 223 platforms across 66 assets, pulling APYs, TVL and risk signals from each platform’s own feed and DefiLlama continuously. Compare platforms, or start from the live yield table.